Markets
BTC/USD83,395-0.27%
ETH/USD2,553+0.78%
SOL/USD111.53+0.22%
S&P 5007,811.54+0.59%
GOLD4,195.80-0.49%
DXY102.38+0.17%
HACKED ARCHIVE

Hacked Event Broadcast

Verified blockchain security incidents with original evidence and historical event dates.

Live source archive
Oct 12, 20262308 verified updatesTimes shown in UTC
Hacked target: MIN Spell

Description of the event: MIN Spell posted on X that the team discovered a security vulnerability affecting some deprecated V4 Cauldrons on the Ethereum mainnet. During the attack, the attacker minted 1.79 million MIM. Shortly afterward, the DAO Treasury identified and fixed the vulnerability, confirmed that no other Cauldrons or user funds were affected, and repurchased all impacted MIM from the market, fully offsetting the impact of the attack.

Amount of loss: $ 1,790,000Attack method: Contract Vulnerability
Hacked target: BNB Chain

Description of the event: On October 1, BNB Chain officially announced that its English Twitter account had been compromised and was under emergency recovery, warning users not to click on any links.Subsequent investigation revealed that the incident involved a total of 10 phishing links, resulting in losses of approximately $8,000, with a single user losing as much as $6,500.The attacker deployed a phishing contract address, injected $17,800, and exchanged it for $22,000 worth of tokens. Following the incident, the team implemented additional security measures to prevent similar occurrences and further strengthened account protection.As of October 31, all user compensations related to this phishing incident have been completed, and transaction details are available on Etherscan. The root cause of the incident has been confirmed as phishing links, which have since been removed and brought under control.

Amount of loss: $ 8,000Attack method: Phishing Attack
Hacked target: dTRINITY

Description of the event: The DeFi protocol dTRINITY suffered an exploit targeting its swap adapter contracts, resulting in the loss of approximately $56,000 belonging to core team members.

Amount of loss: $ 56,000Attack method: Contract Vulnerability
Hacked target: Hyperdrive

Description of the event: The DeFi protocol Hyperdrive, built on the Hyperliquid chain, was exploited. The attacker repeatedly abused an arbitrary call vulnerability in the router, resulting in a loss of approximately $782,000.

Amount of loss: $ 782,000Attack method: Contract Vulnerability
Hacked target: HyperVault

Description of the event: The DeFi protocol HyperVault, built on the Hyperliquid chain, has executed a rug pull, making off with approximately $3.61 million.

Amount of loss: $ 3,610,000Attack method: Rug Pull
Hacked target: GriffinAI

Description of the event: The attackers exploited a misconfigured LayerZero bridge along with a compromised private key for the GAIN BSC contract. By setting a malicious peer contract on Ethereum, they bypassed validation checks and minted 5 billion counterfeit GAIN tokens on BSC. The attackers then sold approximately 150 million of these counterfeit tokens (about 2.8% of the total fake supply) on PancakeSwap, cashing out around USD 3 million.

Amount of loss: $ 3,000,000Attack method: Private Key Leakage
Hacked target: SBI Crypto

Description of the event: According to on-chain investigator ZachXBT, Japan’s financial giant SBI Group may have experienced a security breach involving its cryptocurrency mining subsidiary, SBI Crypto. Wallet addresses associated with the company reportedly saw approximately USD 21 million in suspicious outflows on September 24. The stolen funds included multiple cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Litecoin (LTC), Dogecoin (DOGE), and Bitcoin Cash (BCH). The attacker transferred the funds through five instant exchange platforms before ultimately depositing them into the Tornado Cash mixing protocol.

Amount of loss: $ 21,000,000Attack method: Unknown
Hacked target: Seedify

Description of the event: Meta Alchemist, founder of the Web3 incubator and launchpad platform Seedify, announced on X that one of its SFUND bridges was recently hacked. According to Seedify’s official account, a DPRK-affiliated group known for multiple Web3 exploits gained access to a developer’s private key. Using this access, the attackers were able to mint a large number of SFUND tokens through a bridge contract that had previously passed audit.As a result, the OFT contract was compromised, allowing the attackers to alter its settings and mint unauthorized tokens on Avalanche.Subsequently, the hacker transferred the minted tokens across multiple chains, including BNB, where they sold most of the SFUND tokens. In response, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao stated that he had communicated with several security experts in the industry, who successfully tracked and froze approximately $200,000 of the stolen funds on the HTX exchange.

Amount of loss: $ 1,700,000Attack method: Private Key Leakage
Hacked target: Corepound

Description of the event: The DeFi project Corepound, built on the Core DAO blockchain, has carried out a rug pull, making off with approximately $400,000.

Amount of loss: $ 400,000Attack method: Rug Pull
Hacked target: UXLINK

Description of the event: AI-driven Web3 social platform UXLINK suffered an attack affecting platform-related assets, resulting in losses exceeding USD 11 million. Investigation showed that the attacker had prepared for months prior to the incident, impersonating a business partner and leveraging deepfake video conferencing as part of a social engineering scheme. Through these methods, the attacker gained access to the personal devices of several SAFE key holders and obtained sensitive information such as passwords and private keys. After gaining control over the legacy arb-UXLINK smart contract, the attacker executed unauthorized token minting and subsequently transferred and sold the assets. UXLINK CEO Rolland Saf stated that several million dollars have been recovered through immediate collaboration with exchanges, and all recovered funds have been allocated to buybacks in support of the community. In addition, significant security enhancements have been made to signing devices, internal processes, and infrastructure to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.

Amount of loss: $ 11,000,000Attack method: Social Engineering
Hacked target: Yala

Description of the event: On September 14, the stablecoin protocol Yala disclosed that a recent security incident occurred when a hacker abused a temporary deployment key during the setup of an authorized cross-chain bridge. The attacker deployed an unauthorized bridge and extracted 7.64 million USDC (approximately 1,636 ETH). On October 29, the suspect involved in the case was arrested by law enforcement in Bangkok, Thailand, and most of the affected funds have been successfully recovered.

Amount of loss: $ 7,640,000Attack method: Security Vulnerability
Hacked target: Kame Aggregator

Description of the event: Kame Aggregator suffered an exploit due to a design flaw in the swap() function, which allowed arbitrary executor calls. This vulnerability enabled attackers to transfer tokens authorized to the AggregationRouter by users, particularly those with unlimited or oversized approvals. The total value of affected assets was approximately $1.32 million, of which around $946,000 was recovered by the Kame team from the primary exploiter, and about $22,000 was recovered by white-hat hackers.

Amount of loss: $ 1,320,000Attack method: Contract Vulnerability
Hacked target: Shibarium Bridge

Description of the event: The Shibarium bridge, connecting the Layer 2 network of the same name to Ethereum, was targeted in a flash loan attack, resulting in a loss of approximately $2.4 million. The attacker used a flash loan to purchase 4.6 million BONE tokens and obtained validator signing keys, gaining control of the majority of validator power, and ultimately signed a malicious state to drain assets from the bridge.

Amount of loss: $ 2,400,000Attack method: Flash Loan Attack
Hacked target: Nemo Protocol

Description of the event: Nemo Protocol, a DeFi protocol on Sui, was attacked, resulting in a loss of approximately $2.4 million.

Amount of loss: $ 2,400,000Attack method: Unknown
Hacked target: SwissBorg

Description of the event: Swiss crypto platform SwissBorg suffered a security incident in which approximately 192,600 SOL (~$41.5M) was stolen on Solana. According to SwissBorg’s official statement, the incident was caused by a compromised partner API, impacting its SOL Earn program.

Amount of loss: $ 41,500,000Attack method: Third-party Vulnerability
Hacked target: Aqua

Description of the event: On-chain investigator ZachXBT reported that the Solana project Aqua has likely executed a rug pull involving approximately 21,770 SOL (~$4.65M). A few hours ago, the funds were split into four parts, moved through multiple intermediary addresses, and then sent to various instant exchanges.

Amount of loss: $ 4,650,000Attack method: Rug Pull
Hacked target: Bunni

Description of the event: Bunni, a DEX built on Uniswap v4, was exploited on Ethereum and UniChain, with total losses of approximately $8.4 million.

Amount of loss: $ 8,400,000Attack method: Contract Vulnerability
Hacked target: BetterBank

Description of the event: The PulseChain-based defi project BetterBank was exploited by an attacker who took advantage of a vulnerability that allowed them to mint arbitrary tokens, some of which they then swapped for ETH. The attacker later returned around $2.7 million of the stolen assets, having cashed out around $1.4 million.

Amount of loss: $ 5,000,000Attack method: Contract Vulnerability
Hacked target: Equilibria Finance

Description of the event: According to an announcement from Equilibria Finance, a vulnerability was discovered in the ePENDLE auto-compounder contract on Ethereum, resulting in a loss of approximately 13.36 ETH. The issue stemmed from the stk-ePENDLE contract on Ethereum mainnet not being configured as non-transferable. The attacker used flash loans via Balancer to acquire ePENDLE, staked it into stk-ePENDLE, and then repeatedly transferred stk-ePENDLE across multiple addresses. Each transfer triggered a reward claim, enabling the attacker to drain the unclaimed rewards from the contract.

Amount of loss: $ 62,500Attack method: Contract Vulnerability
Hacked target: ABCCApp

Description of the event: ABCCApp on BSC was reportedly attacked, resulting in a loss of approximately $10.1K. The root cause was that the contract’s addFixedDay() function lacked access control, and fixedDay was used in calculating claimable USDT.

Amount of loss: $ 10,100Attack method: Contract Vulnerability